Health Informatics: The Ethical and Legal Practice of Health Informatics
HOW TO MAKE A COMMENT! (Click Edit ->Highlight text or item to comment on -> Click Comment -> Click Save)
Summer 2012 Projects: Case #1
Team #1: Genetic Discrimination Team #2: Medical Record Release for Court Case Team #3: HIV Pilot Team #4: Crowdsourcing Data (alternative report, please do not comment)
Summer 2012 Projects: Case #2 Team #1: Malfunction 54 Team #2: Malfunction 54 Team #3: Malfunction 54 Team #4: Malfunction 54
Peer-comments
Please review your classmates projects over the course of the following week-end.
Instructions for posting a comment (in a comment box)
Please give constructive feedback beyond "I agree" or "atta boy"responses. The presentations are in their final form, so unless you have a compelling enlightenment to add don't feel pressed to come up with something. Every team has researched and brought forward to you, the reader, the most important and well synthesized points to each case. So, I'd rather have you share with the authors of each case presentation what you learn from their work. What you find most compelling. Whether you agree or have further questions on why the came to the conclusions that they did. The analysis of each case is not a black and white answer, it is the best conclusion that the team agreed upon. These are not cut and dried situations. So, please ask the authors for further clarification on their conclusions. They have educated themselves in the materials that clarify their case and should be able to extrapolate.
Health Informatics: The Ethical and Legal Practice of Health Informatics
HOW TO MAKE A COMMENT! (Click Edit ->Highlight text or item to comment on -> Click Comment -> Click Save)
Summer 2012 Projects: Case #1
Team #1: Genetic DiscriminationTeam #2: Medical Record Release for Court Case
Team #3: HIV Pilot
Team #4: Crowdsourcing Data (alternative report, please do not comment)
Summer 2012 Projects: Case #2
Team #1: Malfunction 54
Team #2: Malfunction 54
Team #3: Malfunction 54
Team #4: Malfunction 54
Peer-comments
Please review your classmates projects over the course of the following week-end.Instructions for posting a comment (in a comment box)
Please give constructive feedback beyond "I agree" or "atta boy"responses. The presentations are in their final form, so unless you have a compelling enlightenment to add don't feel pressed to come up with something. Every team has researched and brought forward to you, the reader, the most important and well synthesized points to each case.So, I'd rather have you share with the authors of each case presentation what you learn from their work. What you find most compelling. Whether you agree or have further questions on why the came to the conclusions that they did. The analysis of each case is not a black and white answer, it is the best conclusion that the team agreed upon. These are not cut and dried situations. So, please ask the authors for further clarification on their conclusions. They have educated themselves in the materials that clarify their case and should be able to extrapolate.
CASE RESULTS: Legalities
CASE #1: Privacy Act Violation (sample B project)CASE #1:Medical Record Release for Court Case (sample A+ project)
Grading Rubric
CASE RESULTS: Safety
CASE #2: Malfunction 54!